2390 Shares

The Supreme Court decisions in New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985) and Vernonia School District v. Acton (1995) show?

The Supreme Court decisions in New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985) and Vernonia School District v. Acton (1995) show? Topic: Case school district
May 25, 2019 / By Alyssia
Question: The Supreme Court decisions in New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985) and Vernonia School District v. Acton (1995) show that Answer A. a student’s right to privacy is limited under certain conditions B. a student has no guaranteed rights while in school C. racially segregated schools are unconstitutional D. prayer in public schools must be limited
Best Answer

Best Answers: The Supreme Court decisions in New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985) and Vernonia School District v. Acton (1995) show?

Vincent Vincent | 1 day ago
A. a student’s right to privacy is limited under certain conditions The two cases refer to protection under the Fourth Amendment.
👍 90 | 👎 1
Did you like the answer? The Supreme Court decisions in New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985) and Vernonia School District v. Acton (1995) show? Share with your friends

We found more questions related to the topic: Case school district


Vincent Originally Answered: How does the system of checks and balances in the U.S. government affect Supreme Court Decisions?
If you do nothing else today, please trust me on this -- the top two answerers to this question are totally wrong. Of course Congress can overturn the Supreme Court, and does so frequently. The Supreme Court rules in one of two ways: Statutory Interpretation, and Constitutional Interpretation. Under Statutory Interpretation, the court is interpreting a law made by Congress. Some years ago, the Supreme Court made a series of interpretations of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Congress was not amused by these rulings; and to rebuff the court, re-wrote the law in the Civil Rights Act of 1991. If the court is interpreting statute, Congress can check the Supreme Court be re-writing the statute, thus nullifying the court's ruling. This is Congress saying to the court -- "No. You got it wrong. We didn't mean THAT at all. THIS is what we meant." If the Court is ruling on a matter of Constitution, Congress can rebuff the Supreme Court by passing a new Constitutional amendment and forwarding it on to the states for ratification. After what many in Congress deemed to be poor Supreme Court rulings based on the 14th amendment, Congress passed and sent on to the states, the 15th Amendment, as a means of trying to put the courts back in line. Furthermore, Article III of the Constitution gives Congress total control over the Supreme Court's appellate docket. If Congress wanted to, they could pass a law, and then forbid the court to accept cases based on it. They did this a few years ago by forbidding the court to hear cases based on the Defense of Marriages Act. The effect of this is to impose a "gag rule" on the court. Congress has MANY checks on the court -- trust me.
Vincent Originally Answered: How does the system of checks and balances in the U.S. government affect Supreme Court Decisions?
The late Alexander Bickel, a law professor at Yale, used to refer to the United States Supreme Court as "the least dangerous branch" because it had neither the power of the sword, which resides in the executive branch, nor the power of the purse, which resides in the legislative branch. All that the Court had, and has, is the power of moral suasion, which hasn't always been enough. For example, when the Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Marshall ruled that the Cherokees could keep their land despite white Americans' desire for the gold that lay under it, then-President Andrew Jackson was said to have retorted, "John Marshall has made his decision. Now let him enforce it."
Vincent Originally Answered: How does the system of checks and balances in the U.S. government affect Supreme Court Decisions?
The Supreme Court does change and its members are picked by the President, which has to be approved by by the Senate, not sure of the House, but yes the Supreme Court could be altered to slant one way or another, the current team is Samuel Anthony Alito the the current Chief Justice, John Roberts was put in by Bush, Stephen Gerald Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg put in by Clinton, Clarence Thomas and David Hackett Souter put in by Bush Sr, Anthony McLeod Kennedy and Antonin Gregory Scalia put in by Reagan, John Paul Stevens was put in by Ford, So all together, that makes 2 democratic, 6 republican Associate Justice and the Chief Justice is Republican, most of these changes were made when checks and balances were not in place. PS: My compliments to the people who have done their research, it makes for some interesting reading

Royal Royal
no longer sufficient training... a million) replaced into there an anti-gay clause interior the colleges structure/rules/rules? 2) were students (no longer mom and pa yet students) required to study and signal the style/rules/rules before admission to the faculty? 3) replaced into the penalty for non adherence for particular reported interior the similar structure/rules/rules? If no longer replaced into there a separate document with signature required for outcomes? 4) Did the faculty follow the agreed upon and signed equipment of rules and outcomes (in the experience that they'd one) ? (I.E. If the penalty itemizing reported a student could nicely be expelled after breaking 3 rules, were the ladies expelled after breaking in reality one?) inner optimal colleges in evaluation to public colleges can lay down discriminatory rules and could implement them as lengthy by utilising way of truth the rules are patently reported and signed by utilising utilizing all activities... Do I evaluate discrimination ? No... Do i have were given self assurance inner optimal colleges have a suitable to discriminate as lengthy by utilising way of truth the discriminatory rules are patently reported and agreed upon by utilising utilizing all activities? particular legally they do... The door to religious discrimination doesn't could nicely be opened, it replaced into knocked off the hinges years interior the previous.... Edit: Even inner optimal colleges take public money contained in this style of faculty vouchers... The money could definately be looked into to substantiate if any rules in that section were damaged.... in the experience that they weren't no penalty for the faculty is warrented, on the diverse hand if rules in that section were damaged the outcomes could word...
👍 30 | 👎 -1

Royal Originally Answered: When the Calif. Supreme Court overturns the whole gay marriage thing- the US Supreme court will do what?
I thought it was the California Supreme Court that decided it was OK in the first place - it was the voters that decided against it - apparently by an extremely small margin - about 4 % of the vote. So why would the California Supreme Court go against its own decision? That doesn't make any sense.
Royal Originally Answered: When the Calif. Supreme Court overturns the whole gay marriage thing- the US Supreme court will do what?
The states rights declare is nonsense - witness this quote: "we are of course very disenchanted interior the determination. The treatment is a constitutional modification. The shape defines marriage as a union between one guy and one woman," stated Glen Lavy, senior suggestions for the corporation. it is the genuine purpose: to inject hassle-free bigotry back into the shape - i assume some people nonetheless have not gotten over the 14th, or that inter-racial marriage di no longer reason the republic to fall, or that gay marriage has no longer brought about Canada, Spain, or everywhere else it is criminal a minute's well worth of worry. i assume they are rather only projecting religious fears of being smote or something, yet that's no longer something for the two State or US Constitutions to be aggravating approximately. Edit: Allen - that may no longer the courtroom legislating - there enhance right into a particular case/dispute that enhance into tried in decrease courts, and appealed to the SC, and that they governed - how else do you anticipate it to artwork if unlike that? according to possibility a overview of all the tests and balances area of civics type is to confirm which you?

If you have your own answer to the question case school district, then you can write your own version, using the form below for an extended answer.