Ethically speaking, what's the difference between eating a dog and eating a pig?
Topic: Our food your questions case study
July 24, 2019 / By Caleigh Question:
Or between eating a cat and eating a bunny? Basically, in ethical and logical terms, what justification is there to consider some animals food and others pets or simply non-food? What credibility is there to an Animal Welfare Act that allows atrocities to be commited against cows, pigs, chickens and so many more that would be considered criminal and barbaric if commited against cats or dogs?
So, michelle, according to you, the definition of pet is an animal that is sold at a pet store...? OK. And that is relevant to this question how? Or are you trying to say that only those animals deserve ethical consideration? I bet you're not even aware that when you buy animals from a pet store you're more often than not actually supporting the suffering of countless dogs and other animals you cherish because they're considered pets. I bet you have no idea what goes on in puppy mills, or even what they are!
Really, if you're just commenting to show your ignorance, why bother?
I should add that it's a confirmed fact that pigs are actually smarter than dogs. Chickens are also quite intelligent too, as several studies have prooved. And as for the cuddliness... what about bunnies? I can't think of many cuddlier animals. Not that it could be considered an objective criteria anyway, but just for the ones who see things like that.
Best Answers: Ethically speaking, what's the difference between eating a dog and eating a pig?
Alycia | 3 days ago
There is no difference.
I notice many people are saying its a cultural difference, they are not answering your question. Maybe they don't want to think about it too much in case thier moral fabric collapses.
people create a shield and try to pretend that somehow farm animals are not the same. Its just a defensive strategy to hide from all the pain, torture, abuse and death that meat-eaters pay for.
If people really accepted the truth about animals they would stop eating them. Unfortunately, modern farming allows people to keep away from the screams.
We have pet cows, sheep and chickens on our land and you can be quite sure that they have character, feelings, thought, suffer pain, enjoy playing, enjoy companionship....
I do thing its rather strange that because they are too big to be in a house as a pet that somehow humans value these animals lives less - it seems a bit of a random reason to me.
👍 274 | 👎 3
Did you like the answer? Ethically speaking, what's the difference between eating a dog and eating a pig?
Share with your friends
We found more questions related to the topic: Our food your questions case study
Originally Answered: Eating disorders. why would someone feel that an eating disorder is not a medical condition?
I don't really know if this is what you're looking for, but here is my opinion on it. I've had an eating disorder for a while now, and the way I feel, as well as some of my friends with disorders, is that we don't want to be helped. My personal belief is that if you want to end your eating disorder, you'll end it. I don't want to stop mine, so mine won't stop. But on plenty of occasions I've seen girls who have just had enough and they helped themselves to recover. Have you ever met someone who wanted to have AIDS? That's my point. Most of the girls I know with eating disorders don't want to be helped. And many of them can't. I hope that's what you're looking for =)
Ethics in this case is personal ,you say "atrocities" against cows chickens etc.If someone would prefer to eat dogs and cats do so in a manner that does not differ than the existing practises used for harvesting beef or chicken in doing that you have not eaten pets you have eaten livestock and the only justification you need is that you prefered the taste.The fact of the matter is that most meat is potential food and eating meat is primal i would tend to think that beef and chicken was originally eaten because of the amount meat on cattle and the ease of catching chicken and then as time progressed farming them and other so called food animals and then it just becomes common place and widely accepted but it is only ignorant people that cant justify any meat as potential food Even if it barks or is very cute
👍 120 | 👎 -1
Ethically, no difference at all. The only justification is social acceptance in your community (however large that is). On a global scale, in order not to offend anyone, we would not eat cat, dog, cow, horse, pig or in fact most animals. On a global scale cat, dog, cow, horse and pig (and more) are all eaten and accepted (albeit only locally in some cases) as legitimate food sources.
Atrocity against man or beast should be discouraged at all levels.
👍 118 | 👎 -5
There are some nutritional differences, i.e., like eating steak instead of chicken. But, It comes down to a matter of culture chief. In the US, we view cats and dogs as extended family, hence it makes it more difficult to buy a rump roast dog or cat. Eating rabbits are not as bad because they are not common housepets, but, they are perceived as cute animals and have been infused into popular culture (bugs bunny) and are rarely found in any grocery store in the U.S. It comes down to culture.
👍 116 | 👎 -9
Technically speaking laws are written from a bias... if you start from the beginning you can assign all animals equal rights and protection from killings.
But you also have to look at the fact that, politics and ethics aside, we are biological ominovores and we choose different animals, by culture, to eat. You cannot legislate vegan diet to all the world's populations. You can, however, legislate kinder means of killing for food consumption.
👍 114 | 👎 -13
Originally Answered: Will it make a big difference going to the gym twice a day versus once if it means eating more?
Going to the gym twice a day isn't recommended. You'll just end up hurting yourself and won't gain any benefit. I know its difficult, but the most important thing after exercise is proper diet. If you eat a bar of chocolate then go to the gym, all you'll burn is blood sugar, not fat.
My advice is to have 3 meals a day. No snacking in between. If you really want to lose weight you have to stick to this and accept that there is no easy way to lose weight.
Get yourself a fixed diet plan. Write down on a piece of paper what you're going to eat for the week and stick to it.
Here's my advice:
For dinner, have one meat or fish (lean of course, and not fried) and two veg (no potatoes), with fist size portions of each. No dressings, sauces or salt though. Have some yogurt, make sure its the low fat variety, or alternatively, have some fruit. Lunch should follow the same rules as dinner; this will ensure you manage to avoid snacking and allow your body time to burn off fat.
Here's my suggestion for a plan:
Breakfast: Two hard boiled eggs (or microwave scrambled) and a banana.
Lunch: Chicken salad containing chicken, lettuce and tomato (pre-prepared at home)
Dinner: Filet Mignon steak with peas and carrots
Also take a multivitamin tablet every morning (preferably one with added minerals, ask your pharmacist) to make sure your body has all the vitamins it needs to work in top condition all day.
This diet should set you on the road to the achieved effect. If you're doing exercise, give yourself the added boost with an apple or half a banana. It may not sound like much, but under diet conditions it'll give you a massive boost in blood sugar.
To drink: water, water, water. But don't just drink water. Fill yourself with water. I'm talking 10 cups a day at least. This will boost your metabolism and ensure you're burning fat at optimum speed. Plus it'll make you feel better all round as it'll help all your body's natural processes. In fact, this whole diet should help you feel better: the better you eat the better you feel!
As I said before, there's no easy way, you have to be really tough on yourself. No chocolate or sweets, nothing with sugar except fruit. This way your body should start to burn off the fat instead of just sugar.
Hope this helps,